![]() |
![]() |
|
|||
|
Parsky Commission's Tax Proposal DOA
I try to avoid doomed ideas like the
plague. There are too many solvable problems in our state to waste energy and
resources on reforms that are going nowhere fast. You would think, especially
with his poll numbers, that the Governor would do the same. But today he called
a special session of the legislature to overhaul our state’s tax code,
cheerleading a proposal almost nobody else likes. In fact, the final recommendations
of the Commission on the 21st Century Economy, a
bipartisan group brought together by legislative leaders and the governor, only
won the support of nine of the fourteen commission members. Kevin Yamamura at
the Sacramento Bee digs into the details of the proposed overhaul, and how it
would affect taxpayers, here. First, the Commission proposes to
dramatically lower taxes for the wealthiest Californians, a dubious idea in the
midst of the state’s worst budget crisis in recent memory, and one that is
unlikely to win the support of the Democrat-controlled legislature. The Commission also proposes to
abolish the corporate income tax entirely, and replace it with a business net
receipts tax (a variation on the European value added tax). There are so many
tax breaks and loopholes in our current corporate income tax that I’m intrigued
by the business net receipts tax’s ability to tax business more broadly and at
a much lower rate. I was disappointed to see, however, that the Commission
chose to grandfather in many of the corporate tax breaks, like net operating
loss credits, that lead to the unlevel corporate taxes we have in place today. Despite those tax credits, leading
business groups are wary of the uncertainty inherent in the proposed changes.
Labor unions are worried about whether the changes would incentivize moving
more jobs out-of-state. Especially since the Commission rarely took meaningful
public comment in their open meetings (at one six-hour meeting in Los Angeles
the Chairman declined to take any public comment at all, even though dozens of
audience members had waited patiently throughout the meeting) it's not
surprising that they don't have many powerful groups on board with their plan.
No one seems to like the proposal, except for the governor. It's unfortunate, really, because
our tax code is sorely in need of updating. We should be taxing business more
broadly, and getting rid of tax breaks that unfairly give some companies a leg
up over others. And we need a stronger rainy day fund - the best way to deal
with the volatility of our economy and our state revenue. But this proposal doesn’t have the political
support to even get out of the gates. And that’s probably a good thing.
|
SEARCH THIS SITE |