You are here
Home >Blog
CALPIRG supports Prop 37 and encourages you to support it, too.
The concept behind Prop 37 is simple. Should we as consumers know more about what is in our food? Should we know if our food contains genes that are modified through engineering?
On the face of it, the answer is obvious. Of course! People who care about the information will make shopping decisions based on it. I’m about to become a new parent, so this information is more important to me now than ever before. For those who don’t care, they can ignore the label.
But Monsanto, DuPont and others have spent $41 million to defeat Prop 37. They are corporate interests looking to protect their pocketbooks, and in the process have cast doubt on the need for genetically engineered labeling. Not wanting to turn a deaf ear to their opposition, we took the time to look into whether there is indeed cause for concern with genetically engineered food.
We found a number of reasons why you and I would want to know whether our food contains genetically engineered ingredients.
1. There is no reliable evidence that genetically engineered foods are safe to eat. No long-term comprehensive studies have been conducted, which is enough to steer some consumers away.
2. Many genetically engineered crops are developed specifically to withstand an increased use of pesticides. Genetically engineered crops have resulted in a 7 percent increase in pesticide use since they were introduced. [1] And crops like Monsanto’s sweet corn are genetically engineered to contain an insecticide known as Bt directly in their genes. There may be health risks associated with this increased pesticide use.
3. There are unintentional environmental consequences to genetically engineered crops. These include the spread of “super weeds” that have already become resistant to the chemicals in Roundup and other pesticides used on GE crops, and the loss of biodiversity from the increased use of pesticides.
Unfortunately, Big Agribusinesses and chemical companies are spending millions in an attempt to convince the public to defeat this measure. The biggest funders of the “No on Prop 37” campaign are Monsanto, DuPont, Pepsi Co, Dow Agrosciences and Bayer Crop Science.[2]
Most of these companies develop and sell either the chemical pesticides used on genetically engineered crops or the genetically engineered seeds, and they are putting profits of ahead of public health and consumers’ rights.
Especially as someone who is about to become a new parent, it’s important to me that I know what I’m eating, and what I’m feeding my child.
Vote YES on Prop 37. We have the right to know what is in our food.
[1] Environment Sciences Europe [pdf], Sept. 28, 2012.
[2] Voters Edge California, Oct. 29, 2012.
Tools & Resources
-
A New Direction In Driving Trends
Our Changing Relationship with Driving and the Implications for America’s FutureCALPIRG Education Fund
Our Affiliates
Contact
Archives
You Can Help
We have a chance to cut billions in junk food subsidies this year. Your support will help us do the research, advocacy and grassroots organizing to convince our elected officials to act.
PRIORITY ACTION
Each year, our tax dollars pay for enough junk food additives to buy 8.5 two-liter bottles of soda for each person under 18. Help stop the subsidies for junk food.
Consumer Alerts
Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.

Comments
I am green hand right here and in addition firstly i would want to are saying how are you ? to folks
Hi. I am not sure if I come be the victor in the previous arguments. I have a predicament.
I think prop 37 is so important to put in place here. So much good that comes from it so much here. The options are endless with it. Great job on this.
Home Renovations Kitchener