logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Still in the Dark

12/31/2007

Executive Summary

Consumers often have little knowledge
of, or control over, how companies
with which they do business share
their personal information with other
businesses. To protect consumers’ privacy,
California enacted the cutting-edge “Shine
the Light” law in 2003, giving consumers
new ways to learn how personal information
is shared among businesses, and to opt
out of such sharing.
In 2006, CALPIRG Education Fund
asked members of CALPIRG to take part
in a survey to determine how businesses
respond to questions about the sharing of
personal information of the kind covered
by the “Shine the Light” law. Fifty-two individuals
each contacted one company with
which they do business and asked for information
on how their personal information
has been shared with other companies.
Under the law, companies that engage
in data sharing, and receive such a request,
must either disclose the names of
companies with which they have shared
a consumer’s information or provide the
consumer with a cost-free opportunity to
opt out of future sharing.
The results of the survey show that,
while some California businesses respond
quickly and courteously to “Shine the
Light” law information requests, many
consumers were frustrated in their efforts
to find out whether and how their personal
information is shared with other businesses.
Only about one-third (33 percent) of
survey participants reported receiving
a response consistent with the terms of
the “Shine the Light” law.
More than one-third of consumers
reported receiving no response at all to
their request for information.
• Of the 52 participants in the survey,
31 (60 percent) received some type of
response from the company within
30 days, 20 (38 percent) received no
response at all, and one (2 percent)
received a response after 30 days.
• Consumers who contacted companies
by e-mail were far more likely to receive
a response (87 percent response
within 30 days), than consumers who
contacted companies by regular mail
(40 percent response within 30 days).

Of the 31 consumers who received
some response from a company, 17 reported
receiving a response consistent
with the “Shine the Light” law.
• Ten consumers were informed that
the company does not share their personal
information with others, while
six others received a cost-free opportunity
to opt out of further information
sharing. One consumer received
a response on how their information
was shared for non-marketing purposes.
• On the other hand, six consumers
were instructed that they needed to
take additional steps (for example, visit
a Web site or call a toll-free number)
to receive the information they were
seeking, while three others were told
they would receive a response later,
but did not report ever receiving a
response.
Many consumers reported that they
were not satisfied with the companies’
response to their requests or faced
hurdles in receiving an appropriate
response.
• More than one-half of survey participants
reported that they were not
satisfied by the companies’ response to
their request for information.
• While the majority of participants
spent less than 15 minutes submitting
and following up on their requests for
information, five consumers (10 percent)
reported spending more than a
half-hour and two consumers reported
spending more than two hours of
their time communicating with the
companies.
• Several participants reported having
to make multiple attempts to receive
an appropriate response to their request.
As one consumer put it, “I was
disappointed for the run-around … I
will continue with this process, but it
is frustrating and discouraging to do
so.”
The survey demonstrates that, while
the Shine the Light law enabled some
consumers to find information and take
action to preserve their privacy, the law
is difficult to use, businesses’ response
to the law is inconsistent, and steps
should be taken to improve the law.
• Companies that do business with California
consumers should be required
to respond to privacy requests, regardless
of whether they share information
with third parties.
• Companies should be required to
both disclose the personal information
shared, and the third parties with
which it is shared, and provide consumers
with an opportunity to opt out
of future sharing.
• Companies should be required to
disclose their information sharing
practices on their Web sites.
• Companies should be required to
place a box on their Web sites’ privacy
pages allowing consumers to opt out
of information sharing.

darkcover.gif

Still-in-the-Dark.pdf Download the full report.

SEARCH THIS SITE