logo Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Cutting Lender Subsidies

 

What's New

On September 17th the House of Representatives passed HR 3221, the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009, a massive student aid bill which passed out of committee in late July by a vote of 30-17. The bill makes an historic investment in student aid, which should help reduce student debt -  investments that are paid for by cutting excessive lender subsidies from within the loan programs. 

Most students are eligible for federal Stafford loans to help pay for college. The college supplies the loans through one of two ways:

 - Through the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) or,
 - The Direct Loan (DL) program. 

In FFEL, banks and lenders are subsidized to originate and deliver the loans whereas the DL program relies on federal Treasury dollars to do the same.

The recent turmoil in the credit markets meant that the federal government had to create another program to back banks and lenders in the event that they could not fulfill their student lending obligations.
 
The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act moves all federal student lending into the Direct Loan program, which would allow the federal government to use its education dollars more efficiently.  The legislation strengthens the federal student loan program by ensuring that all borrowers have access to affordable loans, regardless of market conditions.
 
Banks and lenders are lobbying heavily to defeat this bill and with your support we can match and overturn their efforts.

 

Overview

Currently, the federal government operates two major programs to provide loans to help students pay for college: the private sector Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) program and the government’s Direct Loan (DL) program.

Former President George W. Bush’s last two budgets revealed that the bank (FFEL) program costs taxpayers billions of dollars more each year to run than does the DL program.

From 1992 to 2004, the cumulative taxpayer subsidy costs were $39 billion for FFEL loans, and only $3 billion for Direct Loans. For a typical college student’s debt of $20,000, the federal government spends nearly $2,200 more in subsidy costs for a loan through the FFEL program.

Building upon that evidence, President Obama this year proposed to eliminate the excessive subsidies to instead apply that money to financial aid.

 



CALPIRG research indicates that high debt limits career options for graduates. Student loan subsidies for private, for-profit lenders can take money away from taxpayers and from the students that would benefit from an increase in student aid.

 

SEARCH THIS SITE