Campaign for Safe Energy

Southern California Edison wants their customers to pay a whopping $2.4 billion for the closed San Onofre nuclear power plant. But Consumers shouldn’t pay for Edison’s multi-million dollar mistakes, they should.


On June 7, 2013 Southern California Edison (SCE) announced that it will permanently retire its San Onofre nuclear power plant. This announcement concluded the saga of the failed multimillion-dollar upgrade project designed to extend the life of California’s largest nuclear power plant.

Now Edison’s management and shareholders are hoping that the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC)—the overseeing regulator—will sign off on a ratepayer-funded bailout for its mistakes and mismanagement. Edison is looking to collect from their customers a whopping $2.4 billion for the closed San Onofre nuclear power plant. [1] That’s an average cost of $490 for each customer to pay for a closed plant! [2]

The PUC is investigating the San Onofre debacle, but one thing is already crystal clear: It is Edison, not ratepayers, which should bear the costs of its mistakes.

Last October, when the PUC held a public hearing on the closure of the San Onofre power plant and considered refunds or reductions for ratepayers, CALPIRG was there to send a clear message that “asking ratepayers to foot the bill for a corporation’s mismanagement is unacceptable.”

So far, nearly 1,400 CALPIRG members have voiced their objection to Edison's demands, and the PUC is showing signs that they're listening. In November, PUC staff proposed to refund customers for nearly $94 million in unreasonable and unnecessary changes. But this was only the first in a series of decisions that the Commission will make - so that's why we need to keep up the pressure and make sure ratepayers aren't kept on the hook for Edison's mistakes.

Tell regulators to protect ratepayers, and hold Edison accountable for their mistakes at the San Onofre nuclear power plant.


[1] “Edison Wants $2.4 Billion from Ratepayers for San Onofre”, Ronald Campbell, Orange County Register, September 4, 2013.

[2] Decommissioning San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Fact Sheet, SCE Fact Sheet, June 12, 2013



Issue updates

News Release | CALPIRG | Safe Energy

CALPIRG Testimony at Legislative Hearing on Nuclear Safety

It will be months, if not years, before we are able to learn all of the lessons from the crisis at Japan’s nuclear power plant. But several lessons are already abundantly clear.  

> Keep Reading
News Release | CALPIRG | Safe Energy

Better Seismic Studies Needed at CA Nuclear Plants

Southern California Edison’s announcement that they will more thoroughly study seismic risks under the San Onofre nuclear power plant is long overdue. State officials have known that the site could experience larger and more frequent earthquakes than were anticipated when the plant was designed. Further study is necessary and prudent to fully understand the risks and prepare for the worst.

> Keep Reading
Report | CALPIRG Education Fund | Safe Energy

Unacceptable Risk

American nuclear power plants are not immune to the types of natural disasters, mechanical failures, human errors, and losses of critical electric power supplies that have characterized major nuclear accidents such as the one at Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan. 

> Keep Reading
News Release | CALPIRG | Safe Energy

Tragedy in Japan a Terrifying Reminder of the Risks of Nuclear Power

We are extremely concerned about the unfolding crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Based on recent news coverage, significant releases of radioactivity have already occurred and more are possible. The impact that the radiation releases could have on the environment and human health could be catastrophic. The crisis in Japan is a sobering reminder that nuclear power is inherently dangerous.

> Keep Reading
News Release | CALPIRG | Safe Energy

Vote No on Props 23 and 26

Prop 23 is an attempt by the out-of state oil industry – including Valero, Tesoro, and the Koch brothers – to prevent California from reducing our oil use. The ballot measure would effectively repeal California’s landmark global warming pollution law. Prop 26 is an attempt by oil companies, the cigarette industry, the chemical industry, and other special interests to avoid accountability for the harms they sometimes cause to our health and safety.

> Keep Reading


View AllRSS Feed

Support Us

Your donation supports CALPIRG’s work to stand up for consumers on the issues that matter, especially when powerful interests are blocking progress.

Consumer Alerts

Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.
Optional Member Code