Findings Make a Compelling Case for Expanding Local Rail and Rapid Bus
Lines, and Building High-Speed Rail to Connect California Cities
As oil prices hit a record
$105 a barrel and gas prices hover just under $4 a gallon, CALPIRG Education
Fund held events at throughout the state to release a
new report calculating oil savings, gas cost savings, and other benefits from
public transportation across the country. The CALPIRG Education Fund report, A Better Way to
Go: Meeting America’s 21st Century Transportation Challenges with
Modern Public Transit examines the challenges faced by America’s transportation system and
the benefits of existing rail and bus projects.
“The recent spike in gas
prices is just one of many compelling reasons why convenient, fast, and reliable
bus and rail service need to be expanded throughout our cities,” said Emily
Rusch, Transportation Advocate with CALPIRG Education Fund. “Let’s face it: the
era of cheap oil is over.”
Many experts predict that gas
prices will exceed $4 a gallon in southern California in the coming weeks and months. Thanks to public
transit, California
saved more than 486 million gallons of oil, roughly equivalent to taking more
than 800,000 cars off the road. That has made California far less dependent on oil than we
otherwise would be, and has made consumers less susceptible to gas price
spikes. In fact, the report estimates that existing public transit results in
more than $1.2 billion dollars in gasoline cost savings annually for consumers.
A few highlights from California:
- The Bay Area’s BART system is the third best
system in the country in oil savings, behind only MTA in New
York and Washington
D.C.’s Metro. BART cut the
Bay Area’s oil use by 199 million gallons.
- The Los Angeles Metro bus system is the number
one bus system in the country in oil savings, cutting Los Angeles’ oil use by more than 56
million gallons.
- Stockton and Bakersfield
were recognized as having the most oil savings from public transit out of
all urbanized areas with populations under 500,000.
Reduced oil dependence and insulation from gas price spikes aren’t
the only benefits. California
has also committed to reducing our global warming pollution by 25% by 2020, a
commitment that will be difficult to reach unless we reduce our dependence on
cars. Public transit prevents almost 3.6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
pollution annually.
The CALPIRG Education Fund
report also found that every dollar invested in public transit reaps more than
two dollars in benefits. Last year the California
state legislature cut more than $1.26 billion from public transit agencies to
balance the state budget.
“California’s
budget was balanced last year with unacceptably high cuts to public transit
agencies,” said Rusch. “We’re calling on Governor Schwarzenegger to ensure
public transit gets its fair share of funding this year, so that we can invest
in local transit and reduce California’s
dependence on oil.”
The report recommends that California leaders commit
the vision and the resources necessary – from federal, state, and local funding
– to build a world-class public transit system in California:
- Expand rapid transit networks in every American city with a
metropolitan population of 1 million or more by 2020.
- Improve the transit experience through upgraded amenities on
trains and buses, including on-board wireless Internet service; technology
to provide real-time information about pickup times; giving transit
vehicles priority in mixed traffic and creating more dedicated lanes for
transit vehicles; and providing on-time service and clean, comfortable
vehicles.
- Keep fares affordable, match transit investments with appropriate
land use planning, and promote other transportation alternatives, such as
bicycling, walking, carpooling and telecommuting.
- Link California’s
cities via the proposed high-speed rail line. A bond measure to fund
construction is on the November 2008 ballot.
“In the 1950s the federal government committed to
building the interstate highway system. Taxpayers have spent more than $400
billion to make that vision a reality. Now, we need a similar national vision
for public transit,” concluded Rusch.
Supplementary Data for Top Ten California Agencies
|
Transit Agency
|
Carbon Dioxide Savings
(metric tons)
|
Oil Savings (gallons)
|
Gasoline Cost Savings
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area
Rapid Transit District
|
1,710,504
|
199,271,554
|
$521,692,928
|
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
|
862,222
|
131,934,791
|
$345,405,283
|
|
San Diego Trolley, Inc.
|
280,886
|
32,591,048
|
$85,323,364
|
|
San Francisco Municipal Railway
|
197,951
|
25,168,128
|
$65,890,159
|
|
Southern
California Regional Rail
Authority
|
178,199
|
22,216,953
|
$58,163,983
|
|
Sacramento Regional Transit
District
|
98,597
|
14,278,966
|
$37,382,333
|
|
Peninsula Corridor Joint
Powers Board
|
106,292
|
13,418,355
|
$35,129,254
|
|
Orange County Transportation
Authority
|
35,397
|
7,519,597
|
$19,686,305
|
|
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
|
52,845
|
7,279,832
|
$19,058,601
|
|
North County Transit
District
|
23,804
|
3,900,688
|
$10,212,001
|
# # #