You are hereHome >
Statement of CALPIRG State Director Emily Rusch
“Southern California Edison’s announcement that they will more thoroughly study seismic risks under the San Onofre nuclear power plant is long overdue. State officials have known that the site could experience larger and more frequent earthquakes than were anticipated when the plant was designed. Further study is necessary and prudent to fully understand the risks and prepare for the worst.
“Gov. Brown and the Public Utilities Commission should demand that the study:
1) Include state-of-the-art three-dimensional seismic reflection mapping;
2) Be independently peer-reviewed by experts; and
3) Be completed and publicly available as soon as possible
“The 7 million California residents that live within 50 miles of the plant deserve nothing less.
“Likewise, PG&E should speed up a similar seismic study for the Diablo Canyon plant near San Luis Obispo. These studies are just one important step of an immediate top-to-bottom safety review needed at both of California’s nuclear facilities. The nuclear crisis in Japan has served as a reminder that nuclear power is inherently risky, and potentially catastrophic.”
For more information on the seismic risks and the follow-up studies recommended for both San Onofre and Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants, read “An Assessment of California’s Nuclear Power Plants: AB 1632 Report,” completed by the California Energy Commission in November 2008.
Tools & Resources
Protect your family and see what hidden hazards to watch out for.
A Consumer Guide to Shopping Around
A Consumers' Guide to a New Cell Phone Plan
CALPIRG Education Fund
Tips & Tools to Stay Safe From ID Theft
Use Your Vote. Raise Our Voice.
Our Changing Relationship with Driving and the Implications for America’s FutureCALPIRG Education Fund
You Can Help
We have a chance to cut billions in junk food subsidies this year. Your support will help us do the research, advocacy and grassroots organizing to convince our elected officials to act.
Each year, our tax dollars pay for enough junk food additives to buy 8.5 two-liter bottles of soda for each person under 18. Help stop the subsidies for junk food.
Join our network and stay up to date on our campaigns, get important consumer updates and take action on critical issues.